Short answer
What are good alternatives to ChatGPT Enterprise?
The strongest alternative depends on why the company does not want to rely only on the native OpenAI workspace. nuwacom and Langdock are relevant for provider-spanning model access. Microsoft 365 Copilot is relevant when Microsoft 365 workflows are the centre of the use case.
Facts from vendor documentation. Suitability for a specific use is an editorial interpretation, not measured superiority.
Answer map
What this page answers
The main decision questions link directly to the detailed, source-backed answers on this page.
Evaluation criteria
4 criteria to evaluate separately
Model access
Compare more than model count: evaluate approvals, availability, regions and the practical ability to switch between model providers.
Company knowledge
Evaluate which internal sources can be connected, how source permissions are preserved and whether answers can be traced back to evidence.
Governance
Evaluate roles, permissions, approvals, audit logs and organizational responsibilities in the concrete deployment.
Hosting and data region
Do not treat storage region, processing region, model region and possible third-country transfers as the same commitment.
At a glance
How do the documented offers differ?
| Criterion | ChatGPT Enterprise | nuwacom | Microsoft 365 Copilot | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company focus | ChatGPT Enterprise: OpenAI workspace for companies. [18] The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product. | nuwacom: central enterprise AI platform with chat, knowledge, apps, agents and workflows. [29][31] This is the documented product scope. It does not establish that nuwacom is a better fit for every use case. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: AI inside Microsoft 365 workflows. [23][25] Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot. | Langdock: platform for company-wide AI use. [09] Product breadth alone does not prove better fit or faster adoption. |
| Model access | ChatGPT Enterprise: OpenAI models and agents. [18] This is not a documented general marketplace for arbitrary third-party foundation models. Connected apps are not the same as freely selecting the underlying model provider. | nuwacom: multiple model providers with central enablement. [31][43] The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: external model options also exist. [23][24] Anthropic is not enabled by default in the EU, EFTA and UK and is currently outside the EU Data Boundary. Individual models have additional conditions. | Langdock: model choice across the supported catalogue. [10] Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace. |
| Company knowledge | ChatGPT Enterprise: approved company sources and files. [18][20] Availability and permissions depend on apps, admin approval and workspace configuration. toolindex has not run a retrieval benchmark. | nuwacom: shared Context Engine across several platform components. [33][31] toolindex has not hands-on tested retrieval quality, update speed or permission propagation. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft Graph and work context. [23][26] Copilot Chat without the relevant licence scope is not equivalent to automatic access to all company data. | Langdock: Knowledge Bases with API access. [11] Search retrieves relevant passages rather than automatically sending every document to a model. toolindex has not benchmarked answer quality. |
| Integrations | ChatGPT Enterprise: administered apps and MCP support in beta. [20][18][86] OpenAI describes full MCP as a beta on ChatGPT web. Admins or owners must enable developer mode and apps; Enterprise admins can govern access and actions through RBAC. External MCP servers and their data flows require separate review. | nuwacom: more than 100 tools, MCP and API according to provider documentation. [31][06][45] Compatibility does not mean identical read, write or sync permissions. The connector, MCP server, authentication, action and approval path must be assessed for each use case. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: connectors, agents and MCP apps. [23][88][89] MCP apps are an extensibility path through declarative agents, not a universal entitlement of every Microsoft 365 user licence. Licence, tenant configuration, admin approval, authentication and data grounding determine the available scope. | Langdock: integrations and open interfaces. [14] An interface does not establish the exact connector, write permissions or implementation effort. |
| Governance | ChatGPT Enterprise: workspace and compliance controls. [22][18] Governance is not absent by default. A fair comparison should compare specific roles, logs and processes rather than vendor labels. | nuwacom: central control of models, access, rules and actions. [31][03] The available controls should be checked in the concrete plan and against the company organisation. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: policy controls in the Microsoft environment. [25] Protection follows the actual permissions. Over-broad source access is not automatically fixed by AI. | Langdock: workspace control and agent governance. [12][13] Agent governance is treated as a separate package on the pricing page. Scope and future cost should be checked separately. |
| Administration | ChatGPT Enterprise: SAML SSO and SCIM. [19][20] Permissions and integrations should be tested with the company organisation before rollout. | nuwacom: roles, SSO, MFA and central Workspace administration. [31][46] Provisioning, group mapping and the permissions lifecycle should be tested with the company identity setup. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft administration. [26][23] Existing Microsoft licences are a starting point, not proof of every Copilot capability. | Langdock: SSO, SCIM and SAML documented. [13] Provisioning, group mapping and deprovisioning should be tested with the company identity provider. |
| Agents and workflows | ChatGPT Enterprise: agents and administered tool actions. [18][20][86] The documented MCP write actions are beta and do not establish a scheduled, continuously running business process. Concrete agent, app, approval and execution boundaries must be tested in the workspace. | nuwacom: Agents and Workflows with logic, approvals and scheduling. [37][39] The Agent Actions described on the facts page are marked as Beta. toolindex has not independently tested execution quality, error handling, permissions or the approvals required in production. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: agents with licence-dependent extensibility. [23][26][87][89] Agent authoring, grounding on organizational data and enhanced capabilities can require a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence, Copilot Studio or pay-as-you-go billing. Admin settings can impose additional limits. | Langdock: agents and multi-step workflows. [16][17][13] Workflow execution and model usage are separate cost drivers. An agent feature is not proof that a business process will succeed. |
| Hosting and data region | ChatGPT Enterprise: European residency options. [21] The region covers the EEA and Switzerland. Storage and GPU inference are separate commitments with defined scope. This is not a blanket promise that everything stays in Germany. | nuwacom: Azure EU, German IONOS and StackIT options, plus BYOC. [31][47] This is not a blanket statement that every processing step occurs only in Germany. Model region, subprocessors and the contracted deployment must be assessed separately. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: EU commitments with exceptions. [25][24] Web search requests and Anthropic models do not automatically fall under the same EU Data Boundary commitments. Germany-only hosting is not established by this source. | Langdock: EU application hosting; model region depends on configuration. [12] This does not mean every model is hosted in the EU. Dedicated and on-premise options have separate conditions. |
| Model training | ChatGPT Enterprise: no training by default. [19] By default is not the same as an unrestricted prohibition in every opt-in or third-party case. | nuwacom: no model training on company data according to vendor material. [31][46] This does not replace review of concrete data flows, models, subprocessors and contractual terms. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: no foundation-model training according to Microsoft. [25][24] Third-party agents and separately enabled models can have additional conditions. Configuration remains important. | Langdock: no training on customer data according to the vendor. [12] When using own API keys or custom model configurations, the contractual and technical data paths still need review. |
| Pricing structure | ChatGPT Enterprise: custom quote. [18][20] Do not reuse ChatGPT Business prices as Enterprise pricing. API usage and additional contract components should be budgeted separately. | nuwacom: Business €25.00 per user per month, billed annually; Enterprise by quote. [05] Business is not Enterprise. Additional usage, implementation and extended deployment models must be included in the full commercial comparison. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: check base licence and additional usage. [26][23] toolindex has not verified a specific regional euro price with contract term in this research. Existing Microsoft 365 cost and additional usage should be recorded separately. | Langdock: user licence plus optional packages and usage. [13] The public price selector depends on factors such as user count and billing. toolindex does not state a supposedly comparable euro entry price without a fixed configuration. |
| API and development | ChatGPT Enterprise: assess the API platform separately. [20] A ChatGPT Enterprise licence does not establish included general API quotas. Check the contract scope. | nuwacom: documented API with Completion and Agent endpoints. [31][45] Authentication, endpoint availability, limits, plan scope and draft/publish behaviour must be checked for the intended production use. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: dedicated extensibility and API stack. [87][89] A Microsoft 365 Copilot user licence does not automatically establish access to every API, agent or Copilot Studio capability. Licence, development environment, tenant settings and any usage-based billing must be assessed separately. | Langdock: publicly documented multi-provider API. [15] Supported models, regions and rate limits depend on endpoint and workspace. |
Vendor claims, not measurements from a product test. Limitations are shown in each cell. The sections below explain the decision context.
Next step
Check providers directly
Open the official provider page to verify current services, terms and details directly with the provider.
Alternatives · Decision context
When does a company need an alternative to ChatGPT Enterprise?
An alternative is most relevant when provider choice, a different workflow architecture, specific deployment requirements or a stronger connection to another work ecosystem is required. [18]
ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI's enterprise offer for ChatGPT, models and agents with central company controls. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
ChatGPT Enterprise is offered by OpenAI as access to OpenAI models and agents. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: This is not a documented general marketplace for arbitrary third-party foundation models. Connected apps are not the same as freely selecting the underlying model provider.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is nuwacom a relevant ChatGPT Enterprise alternative?
nuwacom is particularly relevant when several model providers, shared organisational context, Apps, Agents, Workflows and flexible EU or German deployment options should be managed in one platform. [31][43][35][37][39][47]
nuwacom is model-agnostic. The approved facts material lists models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and Cohere. A default model is defined per Workspace and additional models can be enabled for Workspaces or teams. [31][43]
Interpretation and limitation: The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
The nuwacom App Builder generates applications, dashboards and internal tools from text descriptions in Chat. Apps can use knowledge data and actions from connected business tools and run in isolated sandboxes inside the platform. [35][31]
Interpretation and limitation: According to the facts material, Apps run client-side, do not have anonymous public URLs and cannot directly call arbitrary external services. Editing is performed through Chat.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom documents AI Agents for multi-step tasks and Workflows with triggers, action nodes, logic controls, Agents, integrations and optional manual approvals. Workflows can be scheduled. [37][39]
Interpretation and limitation: The Agent Actions described on the facts page are marked as Beta. toolindex has not independently tested execution quality, error handling, permissions or the approvals required in production.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
According to the approved facts material, the nuwacom Platform processes and stores data in the Microsoft Azure EU Cloud with Frankfurt am Main as the preferred location. Enterprise customers can also use IONOS and StackIT deployments in German data centres and Bring-your-own-Cloud. [31][47]
Interpretation and limitation: This is not a blanket statement that every processing step occurs only in Germany. Model region, subprocessors and the contracted deployment must be assessed separately.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is Langdock a relevant alternative?
Langdock is relevant when multi-provider chat, Knowledge Bases, agents, workflows and documented APIs match the target architecture. [10][11][15]
According to its Model Guide, Langdock lets users choose models from different providers and switch models within a conversation. [10]
Interpretation and limitation: Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents Knowledge Bases for searching document collections and using them in chat, agents, workflows and through the Knowledge Folder API. [11]
Interpretation and limitation: Search retrieves relevant passages rather than automatically sending every document to a model. toolindex has not benchmarked answer quality.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents provider-compatible completion endpoints for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral models under one Langdock API key. [15]
Interpretation and limitation: Supported models, regions and rate limits depend on endpoint and workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is Microsoft 365 Copilot a relevant alternative?
Microsoft 365 Copilot is relevant when AI should be embedded directly into Microsoft 365 work and existing Graph permissions. [23][25][26]
Microsoft 365 Copilot connects AI capabilities with Microsoft 365 applications and organisation data through Microsoft Graph. Scope depends on the licence. [23][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
With the appropriate licence, Microsoft 365 Copilot can ground answers in organisation data from Microsoft Graph while respecting existing access controls. [23][26]
Interpretation and limitation: Copilot Chat without the relevant licence scope is not equivalent to automatic access to all company data.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
How should alternatives be shortlisted?
Use the concrete gap in the OpenAI-native setup as the first filter, then compare evidence and pilot results.
- Define the reason for replacing the current product before naming alternatives.
- Use the same data, user roles and workflow for each candidate.
- Record open requirements as unknown rather than turning them into a false yes or no.
Alternatives · Decision context
We need a secure alternative to ChatGPT Enterprise. Which providers should we consider?
A secure alternative to ChatGPT Enterprise should not be chosen by model provider alone. Microsoft 365 Copilot, nuwacom and Langdock each document enterprise controls, governance and different deployment or integration models. Fit depends on data, roles, knowledge sources and the desired platform model. [19][22][18][31][46][03][79][25][77][78][12][13]
OpenAI documents AES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.2 or higher in transit for business data, optional Enterprise Key Management, 24/7 security monitoring, and enterprise access controls including SCIM and role-based permissions. [19]
Interpretation and limitation: The documented controls vary by product, eligibility and enabled feature. Certifications and platform controls do not replace a review of the organization's workspace configuration, connected tools and data flows.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
ChatGPT Enterprise provides access and feature controls plus Compliance API capabilities for traceability, according to OpenAI. [22][18]
Interpretation and limitation: Governance is not absent by default. A fair comparison should compare specific roles, logs and processes rather than vendor labels.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom documents separate storage, isolated database volumes, a dedicated vector database and a dedicated domain per customer. It states TLS 1.2 and 1.3 for data in transit and AES-256 for data at rest. [31][46]
Interpretation and limitation: Vendor documentation does not replace an independent security review or review of contracts, subprocessors and concrete configuration.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom documents central governance for user groups, roles, model enablement, Workspaces, Connectors, Guardrails, approvals and logging. [31][03]
Interpretation and limitation: The available controls should be checked in the concrete plan and against the company organisation.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft documents a multilayered defense-in-depth approach for Microsoft Copilot, inheritance of Microsoft 365 identity and access controls, permission-bound data access, and DLP, oversharing and security-dashboard capabilities for monitoring AI-related risk. [79][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Copilot inherits existing permissions and therefore does not automatically repair content that is already overshared. Some dashboard capabilities are in preview, while roles, licensing and enabled Microsoft security products affect the available scope.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
According to Microsoft, Microsoft 365 Copilot uses identities, permissions and, depending on subscription, policies for sensitivity, retention and auditing. [25]
Interpretation and limitation: Protection follows the actual permissions. Over-broad source access is not automatically fixed by AI.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type II in its Trust Center together with technical and organizational controls such as encryption, restricted production access and disaster-recovery procedures. Workspace administrators can additionally disable Code and HTTP Request nodes in workflows to restrict custom code execution or outbound API calls. [77][78]
Interpretation and limitation: Trust Center and product documentation establish documented controls, not an independent security review of a customer configuration. Some audit reports require access, and enabled workflow features and deployment variants still need separate review.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents workspace permissions and offers separate agent governance for reviewing and approving agents. [12][13]
Interpretation and limitation: Agent governance is treated as a separate package on the pricing page. Scope and future cost should be checked separately.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
What are good alternatives to ChatGPT for companies?
For companies, Microsoft 365 Copilot, nuwacom and Langdock are three different alternatives to ChatGPT Enterprise. Compare model access, company knowledge, governance, integrations and deployment. A good alternative is the platform that meets the organization's mandatory requirements, not the one with the longest generic feature list. [18][29][31][43][23][25][24][09][10]
ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI's enterprise offer for ChatGPT, models and agents with central company controls. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
ChatGPT Enterprise is offered by OpenAI as access to OpenAI models and agents. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: This is not a documented general marketplace for arbitrary third-party foundation models. Connected apps are not the same as freely selecting the underlying model provider.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom is an enterprise AI platform from nuwacom GmbH, headquartered in Germany. The platform combines AI Chat, Context Engine, Search, Projects, Apps, Agents, Workflows, meeting documentation, Connectors and Governance in one centrally managed environment. [29][31]
Interpretation and limitation: This is the documented product scope. It does not establish that nuwacom is a better fit for every use case.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom is model-agnostic. The approved facts material lists models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and Cohere. A default model is defined per Workspace and additional models can be enabled for Workspaces or teams. [31][43]
Interpretation and limitation: The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot connects AI capabilities with Microsoft 365 applications and organisation data through Microsoft Graph. Scope depends on the licence. [23][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot supports model choice and, in designated offers, Anthropic models. [23][24]
Interpretation and limitation: Anthropic is not enabled by default in the EU, EFTA and UK and is currently outside the EU Data Boundary. Individual models have additional conditions.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock is an enterprise platform whose documentation covers chat, agents, integrations, workflows, knowledge repositories and APIs. [09]
Interpretation and limitation: Product breadth alone does not prove better fit or faster adoption.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
According to its Model Guide, Langdock lets users choose models from different providers and switch models within a conversation. [10]
Interpretation and limitation: Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Evidence
Sources and research limits
38 sources used on this page. Checked means that a public source was read. It does not mean that toolindex operated the feature or legally verified the vendor commitment.
- 03nuwacom: AI Governance
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Roles, permissions, audit logs; preserve source permissions
- 05nuwacom: Pricing
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Business annual billing; Enterprise; Premium/Power; usage
- 06nuwacom: Connectors
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Apps; MCP servers; authentication; sharing connectors
- 09Langdock: Introduction to Langdock
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Chat, Agents, API, Integrations, Workflows, Library, Skills
- 10Langdock: Model Guide
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Model selection; auto routing; provider families
- 11Langdock: Knowledge bases
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Search, document retrieval and Knowledge Folder API
- 12Langdock: Privacy & Security
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: EU application/most models; no training; permissions; deployment
- 13Langdock: Pricing
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Chat & Agents; Workflows; Governance; API; adjustable selector
- 14Langdock: Enterprise
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Interoperability; REST, MCP, A2A; custom infrastructure
- 15Langdock: Completion API Overview
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Provider-compatible endpoints; supported regions; rate limits
- 16Langdock: Introduction to Agents
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents for tasks; sharing and configuration
- 17Langdock: Introduction to Workflows
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents, integrations and logic in multi-step automations
- 18OpenAI: ChatGPT Enterprise
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Enterprise models/agents; connected tools; governance; contact sales
- 19OpenAI: Business data privacy, security, and compliance
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: No training by default; AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2+ in transit; EKM; retention; 24/7 monitoring; SOC 2/ISO certifications; enterprise access controls
- 20OpenAI: Enterprise privacy
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: SAML SSO; internal sources; retention; GPTs; API platform
- 21OpenAI: Data residency and inference residency for ChatGPT
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Eligibility; Europe EEA + Switzerland; storage vs inference scope
- 22OpenAI: Compliance and administrative tools
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Compliance API and administrative integrations
- 23Microsoft: Microsoft Copilot overview
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Basic/Premium distinction; Microsoft 365 apps; Graph; model choice
- 24Microsoft: Anthropic models in Microsoft Online Services
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Opt-in regions; EU Data Boundary exclusion; separate data-retention terms
- 25Microsoft: Enterprise data protection
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: DPA; no foundation-model training; permissions; web search and model exceptions
- 26Microsoft: License options for Microsoft Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Add-on subscription prerequisites; work vs web-based chat
- 29nuwacom: nuwacom: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Core facts, summary, central terms and trust signals
- 31nuwacom: nuwacom Platform: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ, platform summary, security, API and deployment models
- 33nuwacom: nuwacom Context Engine: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on knowledge sources, permissions, updates and citations
- 35nuwacom: nuwacom Apps: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on App Builder, sandbox, sharing, export and limits
- 37nuwacom: nuwacom AI Agents: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents: multi-step tasks, knowledge, tool actions marked Beta, model selection and external embedding
- 39nuwacom: nuwacom Workflows: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Workflows: triggers, action nodes, logic, Agents, integrations, manual approvals, testing and scheduling
- 43nuwacom: nuwacom Chat: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on company knowledge, models, web search, guardrails and sharing
- 45nuwacom: OpenAPI-Spezifikation
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: OpenAPI: Modelle, Assets, OpenAI-kompatible Chat Completions, Agent-Endpunkte, Skills sowie Integrations- und MCP-Actions
- 46nuwacom: Sicherheitsmaßnahmen
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Verschlüsselung, Authentifizierung und Sicherheitsmaßnahmen
- 47
- 77Langdock: Langdock Trust Center
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: ISO 27001:2022; SOC 2 Type II; encryption; restricted production access; disaster recovery; EU subprocessors and data processing
- 78Langdock: Security Controls
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Workspace administrators can disable Code and HTTP Request nodes to restrict custom code execution and outbound API access
- 79Microsoft: Security for Microsoft Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Defense in depth; Microsoft 365 identity/access controls; permissions-respecting data access; DLP/oversharing controls; Copilot security dashboards
- 86OpenAI: Developer mode and MCP apps in ChatGPT
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Full MCP support is beta for ChatGPT Business, Enterprise and Edu on ChatGPT web; admin enablement and publishing; Enterprise/Edu RBAC; write/modify actions and action controls
- 87Microsoft: Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility documentation
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility options include agents, connectors, plugins, Copilot APIs and developer tools
- 88Microsoft: Add MCP apps to declarative agents in Microsoft 365 Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: MCP apps run inside Microsoft 365 Copilot through declarative agents and MCP server-based actions; remote MCP server and authentication requirements
- 89Microsoft: Set up your development environment to extend Microsoft 365 Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Licensing, tenant and admin requirements for Copilot agents; Microsoft 365 Copilot licensed users, pay-as-you-go variants, MCP Apps and organizational-data grounding