Short answer
What are good alternatives to Microsoft 365 Copilot?
A Copilot alternative is most relevant when the company needs more than deep Microsoft 365 integration. nuwacom and Langdock provide independent multi-model platform approaches. ChatGPT Enterprise provides the native OpenAI enterprise environment.
Facts from vendor documentation. Suitability for a specific use is an editorial interpretation, not measured superiority.
Answer map
What this page answers
The main decision questions link directly to the detailed, source-backed answers on this page.
Evaluation criteria
4 criteria to evaluate separately
Model access
Compare more than model count: evaluate approvals, availability, regions and the practical ability to switch between model providers.
Company knowledge
Evaluate which internal sources can be connected, how source permissions are preserved and whether answers can be traced back to evidence.
Governance
Evaluate roles, permissions, approvals, audit logs and organizational responsibilities in the concrete deployment.
Hosting and data region
Do not treat storage region, processing region, model region and possible third-country transfers as the same commitment.
At a glance
How do the documented offers differ?
| Criterion | ChatGPT Enterprise | nuwacom | Microsoft 365 Copilot | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company focus | ChatGPT Enterprise: OpenAI workspace for companies. [18] The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product. | nuwacom: central enterprise AI platform with chat, knowledge, apps, agents and workflows. [29][31] This is the documented product scope. It does not establish that nuwacom is a better fit for every use case. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: AI inside Microsoft 365 workflows. [23][25] Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot. | Langdock: platform for company-wide AI use. [09] Product breadth alone does not prove better fit or faster adoption. |
| Model access | ChatGPT Enterprise: OpenAI models and agents. [18] This is not a documented general marketplace for arbitrary third-party foundation models. Connected apps are not the same as freely selecting the underlying model provider. | nuwacom: multiple model providers with central enablement. [31][43] The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: external model options also exist. [23][24] Anthropic is not enabled by default in the EU, EFTA and UK and is currently outside the EU Data Boundary. Individual models have additional conditions. | Langdock: model choice across the supported catalogue. [10] Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace. |
| Company knowledge | ChatGPT Enterprise: approved company sources and files. [18][20] Availability and permissions depend on apps, admin approval and workspace configuration. toolindex has not run a retrieval benchmark. | nuwacom: shared Context Engine across several platform components. [33][31] toolindex has not hands-on tested retrieval quality, update speed or permission propagation. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft Graph and work context. [23][26] Copilot Chat without the relevant licence scope is not equivalent to automatic access to all company data. | Langdock: Knowledge Bases with API access. [11] Search retrieves relevant passages rather than automatically sending every document to a model. toolindex has not benchmarked answer quality. |
| Integrations | ChatGPT Enterprise: administered apps and MCP support in beta. [20][18][86] OpenAI describes full MCP as a beta on ChatGPT web. Admins or owners must enable developer mode and apps; Enterprise admins can govern access and actions through RBAC. External MCP servers and their data flows require separate review. | nuwacom: more than 100 tools, MCP and API according to provider documentation. [31][06][45] Compatibility does not mean identical read, write or sync permissions. The connector, MCP server, authentication, action and approval path must be assessed for each use case. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: connectors, agents and MCP apps. [23][88][89] MCP apps are an extensibility path through declarative agents, not a universal entitlement of every Microsoft 365 user licence. Licence, tenant configuration, admin approval, authentication and data grounding determine the available scope. | Langdock: integrations and open interfaces. [14] An interface does not establish the exact connector, write permissions or implementation effort. |
| Governance | ChatGPT Enterprise: workspace and compliance controls. [22][18] Governance is not absent by default. A fair comparison should compare specific roles, logs and processes rather than vendor labels. | nuwacom: central control of models, access, rules and actions. [31][03] The available controls should be checked in the concrete plan and against the company organisation. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: policy controls in the Microsoft environment. [25] Protection follows the actual permissions. Over-broad source access is not automatically fixed by AI. | Langdock: workspace control and agent governance. [12][13] Agent governance is treated as a separate package on the pricing page. Scope and future cost should be checked separately. |
| Administration | ChatGPT Enterprise: SAML SSO and SCIM. [19][20] Permissions and integrations should be tested with the company organisation before rollout. | nuwacom: roles, SSO, MFA and central Workspace administration. [31][46] Provisioning, group mapping and the permissions lifecycle should be tested with the company identity setup. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: Microsoft administration. [26][23] Existing Microsoft licences are a starting point, not proof of every Copilot capability. | Langdock: SSO, SCIM and SAML documented. [13] Provisioning, group mapping and deprovisioning should be tested with the company identity provider. |
| Agents and workflows | ChatGPT Enterprise: agents and administered tool actions. [18][20][86] The documented MCP write actions are beta and do not establish a scheduled, continuously running business process. Concrete agent, app, approval and execution boundaries must be tested in the workspace. | nuwacom: Agents and Workflows with logic, approvals and scheduling. [37][39] The Agent Actions described on the facts page are marked as Beta. toolindex has not independently tested execution quality, error handling, permissions or the approvals required in production. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: agents with licence-dependent extensibility. [23][26][87][89] Agent authoring, grounding on organizational data and enhanced capabilities can require a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence, Copilot Studio or pay-as-you-go billing. Admin settings can impose additional limits. | Langdock: agents and multi-step workflows. [16][17][13] Workflow execution and model usage are separate cost drivers. An agent feature is not proof that a business process will succeed. |
| Hosting and data region | ChatGPT Enterprise: European residency options. [21] The region covers the EEA and Switzerland. Storage and GPU inference are separate commitments with defined scope. This is not a blanket promise that everything stays in Germany. | nuwacom: Azure EU, German IONOS and StackIT options, plus BYOC. [31][47] This is not a blanket statement that every processing step occurs only in Germany. Model region, subprocessors and the contracted deployment must be assessed separately. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: EU commitments with exceptions. [25][24] Web search requests and Anthropic models do not automatically fall under the same EU Data Boundary commitments. Germany-only hosting is not established by this source. | Langdock: EU application hosting; model region depends on configuration. [12] This does not mean every model is hosted in the EU. Dedicated and on-premise options have separate conditions. |
| Model training | ChatGPT Enterprise: no training by default. [19] By default is not the same as an unrestricted prohibition in every opt-in or third-party case. | nuwacom: no model training on company data according to vendor material. [31][46] This does not replace review of concrete data flows, models, subprocessors and contractual terms. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: no foundation-model training according to Microsoft. [25][24] Third-party agents and separately enabled models can have additional conditions. Configuration remains important. | Langdock: no training on customer data according to the vendor. [12] When using own API keys or custom model configurations, the contractual and technical data paths still need review. |
| Pricing structure | ChatGPT Enterprise: custom quote. [18][20] Do not reuse ChatGPT Business prices as Enterprise pricing. API usage and additional contract components should be budgeted separately. | nuwacom: Business €25.00 per user per month, billed annually; Enterprise by quote. [05] Business is not Enterprise. Additional usage, implementation and extended deployment models must be included in the full commercial comparison. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: check base licence and additional usage. [26][23] toolindex has not verified a specific regional euro price with contract term in this research. Existing Microsoft 365 cost and additional usage should be recorded separately. | Langdock: user licence plus optional packages and usage. [13] The public price selector depends on factors such as user count and billing. toolindex does not state a supposedly comparable euro entry price without a fixed configuration. |
| API and development | ChatGPT Enterprise: assess the API platform separately. [20] A ChatGPT Enterprise licence does not establish included general API quotas. Check the contract scope. | nuwacom: documented API with Completion and Agent endpoints. [31][45] Authentication, endpoint availability, limits, plan scope and draft/publish behaviour must be checked for the intended production use. | Microsoft 365 Copilot: dedicated extensibility and API stack. [87][89] A Microsoft 365 Copilot user licence does not automatically establish access to every API, agent or Copilot Studio capability. Licence, development environment, tenant settings and any usage-based billing must be assessed separately. | Langdock: publicly documented multi-provider API. [15] Supported models, regions and rate limits depend on endpoint and workspace. |
Vendor claims, not measurements from a product test. Limitations are shown in each cell. The sections below explain the decision context.
Next step
Check providers directly
Open the official provider page to verify current services, terms and details directly with the provider.
Alternatives · Decision context
When does a company need an alternative to Microsoft 365 Copilot?
An alternative is particularly relevant when model-provider choice, a separate AI workspace, non-Microsoft data paths or broader cross-system workflows are central requirements. [23][25][88][89]
Microsoft 365 Copilot connects AI capabilities with Microsoft 365 applications and organisation data through Microsoft Graph. Scope depends on the licence. [23][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot is embedded in Microsoft 365 applications and can be extended through Copilot connectors and agents. Microsoft explicitly documents MCP apps as MCP server-based actions in declarative agents that run inside Microsoft 365 Copilot. [23][88][89]
Interpretation and limitation: MCP apps are an extensibility path through declarative agents, not a universal entitlement of every Microsoft 365 user licence. Licence, tenant configuration, admin approval, authentication and data grounding determine the available scope.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is nuwacom a relevant Copilot alternative?
nuwacom is particularly relevant when several model providers, separate Workspaces, a shared Context Engine, Apps and Workflows should be managed outside a single product ecosystem. [31][43][33][35][37][39]
nuwacom is model-agnostic. The approved facts material lists models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and Cohere. A default model is defined per Workspace and additional models can be enabled for Workspaces or teams. [31][43]
Interpretation and limitation: The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom separates departments, projects and confidentiality levels through dedicated Workspaces. Each Workspace can have its own members, knowledge sources, Connectors, models and rules. [31]
Interpretation and limitation: The actual isolation and permission propagation should be tested with real access-control cases.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
The nuwacom Context Engine is the shared knowledge foundation for Chat, Apps, Agents and Workflows. Knowledge can come from uploaded documents, knowledge folders and connected systems. Answers can identify the sources used. [33][31]
Interpretation and limitation: toolindex has not hands-on tested retrieval quality, update speed or permission propagation.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
The nuwacom App Builder generates applications, dashboards and internal tools from text descriptions in Chat. Apps can use knowledge data and actions from connected business tools and run in isolated sandboxes inside the platform. [35][31]
Interpretation and limitation: According to the facts material, Apps run client-side, do not have anonymous public URLs and cannot directly call arbitrary external services. Editing is performed through Chat.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom documents AI Agents for multi-step tasks and Workflows with triggers, action nodes, logic controls, Agents, integrations and optional manual approvals. Workflows can be scheduled. [37][39]
Interpretation and limitation: The Agent Actions described on the facts page are marked as Beta. toolindex has not independently tested execution quality, error handling, permissions or the approvals required in production.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is Langdock a relevant alternative?
Langdock is relevant when multi-provider model access, Knowledge Bases, agents, workflows and documented APIs match the target architecture. [10][11][15]
According to its Model Guide, Langdock lets users choose models from different providers and switch models within a conversation. [10]
Interpretation and limitation: Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents Knowledge Bases for searching document collections and using them in chat, agents, workflows and through the Knowledge Folder API. [11]
Interpretation and limitation: Search retrieves relevant passages rather than automatically sending every document to a model. toolindex has not benchmarked answer quality.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents provider-compatible completion endpoints for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral models under one Langdock API key. [15]
Interpretation and limitation: Supported models, regions and rate limits depend on endpoint and workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
When is ChatGPT Enterprise a relevant alternative?
ChatGPT Enterprise is relevant when the organisation wants an OpenAI-native enterprise workspace rather than a Microsoft-centric one. [18]
ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI's enterprise offer for ChatGPT, models and agents with central company controls. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
How should alternatives be shortlisted?
Compare the actual target workflow outside Microsoft 365 and require each candidate to demonstrate the same outcome.
- Define the reason for replacing the current product before naming alternatives.
- Use the same data, user roles and workflow for each candidate.
- Record open requirements as unknown rather than turning them into a false yes or no.
Alternatives · Decision context
Which European alternatives to Microsoft Copilot are suitable for companies with sensitive data?
For sensitive data, a Copilot alternative should not be selected by vendor location alone. DPA, data region, model processing, governance and integration into the existing IT environment matter. nuwacom and Langdock are German providers in the current comparison, while ChatGPT Enterprise is another alternative with its own enterprise and residency model. [27][20][21][68][67][31][47][25][24][12]
OpenAI documents a DPA for ChatGPT Enterprise to support GDPR compliance, no training on business data by default, controls for retention and access, and European residency options. [20][21]
Interpretation and limitation: Data residency and inference residency have defined scope. Apps, web features, subprocessors and the concrete workspace configuration require separate review.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
OpenAI documents data residency and separate inference residency in Europe for eligible ChatGPT Enterprise customers. [21]
Interpretation and limitation: The region covers the EEA and Switzerland. Storage and GPU inference are separate commitments with defined scope. This is not a blanket promise that everything stays in Germany.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom provides a public Data Processing Agreement in which it describes itself as processor for customer personal data. Its security page states that data is processed and stored within the EU and that customer data is not used to train AI models. [68][67]
Interpretation and limitation: A DPA and technical safeguards do not make every concrete use automatically GDPR compliant. Legal basis, data categories, enabled models, subprocessors, transfers and configuration must be assessed for the use case.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
According to the approved facts material, the nuwacom Platform processes and stores data in the Microsoft Azure EU Cloud with Frankfurt am Main as the preferred location. Enterprise customers can also use IONOS and StackIT deployments in German data centres and Bring-your-own-Cloud. [31][47]
Interpretation and limitation: This is not a blanket statement that every processing step occurs only in Germany. Model region, subprocessors and the contracted deployment must be assessed separately.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft documents Enterprise Data Protection for its business Copilot offer under the Microsoft DPA, support for GDPR, and that prompts, responses and Microsoft Graph data are not used to train foundation models. [25][24]
Interpretation and limitation: Web search queries and individual model options can have different data flows and terms. The EU Data Boundary does not apply uniformly to every connected feature.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft documents the EU Data Boundary for its business Copilot offer and names specific exceptions. [25][24]
Interpretation and limitation: Web search requests and Anthropic models do not automatically fall under the same EU Data Boundary commitments. Germany-only hosting is not established by this source.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock documents GDPR alignment, a Data Protection Addendum, EU hosting for the application and most configurable models, and no training on customer data. [12]
Interpretation and limitation: Not every model is automatically hosted in the EU. Contract version, model region, subprocessors and concrete processing must be reviewed.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock states EU hosting for the application and most configurable models, with optional dedicated, own-cloud and on-premise deployment models. [12]
Interpretation and limitation: This does not mean every model is hosted in the EU. Dedicated and on-premise options have separate conditions.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
Which independent AI solutions can be used alongside Microsoft 365?
Companies do not need to replace Microsoft 365 to add another AI platform. What matters is whether the alternative provides its own models, knowledge sources, integrations and governance, and how it operates alongside existing Microsoft processes. Parallel use should be checked for data access, identities, overlapping functions and cost. [18][20][86][29][31][06][45][23][25][88][89][09][14]
ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI's enterprise offer for ChatGPT, models and agents with central company controls. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
ChatGPT Enterprise supports administratively controlled apps and sources. OpenAI also documents full MCP support, including write and modify actions, as a beta for ChatGPT Enterprise and Edu on ChatGPT web. [20][18][86]
Interpretation and limitation: OpenAI describes full MCP as a beta on ChatGPT web. Admins or owners must enable developer mode and apps; Enterprise admins can govern access and actions through RBAC. External MCP servers and their data flows require separate review.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom is an enterprise AI platform from nuwacom GmbH, headquartered in Germany. The platform combines AI Chat, Context Engine, Search, Projects, Apps, Agents, Workflows, meeting documentation, Connectors and Governance in one centrally managed environment. [29][31]
Interpretation and limitation: This is the documented product scope. It does not establish that nuwacom is a better fit for every use case.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom describes compatibility with more than 100 tools, including Microsoft 365, SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, Google Drive, Slack and Confluence. MCP servers and the nuwacom API can also be connected; the current OpenAPI specification also exposes MCP clients as a tool context for Agent Actions. [31][06][45]
Interpretation and limitation: Compatibility does not mean identical read, write or sync permissions. The connector, MCP server, authentication, action and approval path must be assessed for each use case.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot connects AI capabilities with Microsoft 365 applications and organisation data through Microsoft Graph. Scope depends on the licence. [23][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot is embedded in Microsoft 365 applications and can be extended through Copilot connectors and agents. Microsoft explicitly documents MCP apps as MCP server-based actions in declarative agents that run inside Microsoft 365 Copilot. [23][88][89]
Interpretation and limitation: MCP apps are an extensibility path through declarative agents, not a universal entitlement of every Microsoft 365 user licence. Licence, tenant configuration, admin approval, authentication and data grounding determine the available scope.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock is an enterprise platform whose documentation covers chat, agents, integrations, workflows, knowledge repositories and APIs. [09]
Interpretation and limitation: Product breadth alone does not prove better fit or faster adoption.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock describes integrations plus REST, MCP and A2A as ways to connect internal systems and tools. [14]
Interpretation and limitation: An interface does not establish the exact connector, write permissions or implementation effort.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Alternatives · Decision context
Which alternatives to Microsoft Copilot are suitable for companies?
Suitable alternatives to Microsoft 365 Copilot depend on whether a company prioritizes Microsoft integration, multiple models, independent knowledge sources, agents, workflows or flexible deployment. ChatGPT Enterprise, nuwacom and Langdock cover these requirements differently and should be compared against the same mandatory criteria. [18][29][31][43][23][25][24][09][10]
ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI's enterprise offer for ChatGPT, models and agents with central company controls. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: The offer is not the same as a personal ChatGPT account or a separately integrated API product.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
ChatGPT Enterprise is offered by OpenAI as access to OpenAI models and agents. [18]
Interpretation and limitation: This is not a documented general marketplace for arbitrary third-party foundation models. Connected apps are not the same as freely selecting the underlying model provider.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom is an enterprise AI platform from nuwacom GmbH, headquartered in Germany. The platform combines AI Chat, Context Engine, Search, Projects, Apps, Agents, Workflows, meeting documentation, Connectors and Governance in one centrally managed environment. [29][31]
Interpretation and limitation: This is the documented product scope. It does not establish that nuwacom is a better fit for every use case.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
nuwacom is model-agnostic. The approved facts material lists models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and Cohere. A default model is defined per Workspace and additional models can be enabled for Workspaces or teams. [31][43]
Interpretation and limitation: The available model catalogue changes. Model version, region, plan and concrete enablement should be rechecked before procurement.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot connects AI capabilities with Microsoft 365 applications and organisation data through Microsoft Graph. Scope depends on the licence. [23][25]
Interpretation and limitation: Microsoft now also uses the name Microsoft Copilot for the offer. This page concerns the business offer, not consumer Copilot.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Microsoft 365 Copilot supports model choice and, in designated offers, Anthropic models. [23][24]
Interpretation and limitation: Anthropic is not enabled by default in the EU, EFTA and UK and is currently outside the EU Data Boundary. Individual models have additional conditions.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Langdock is an enterprise platform whose documentation covers chat, agents, integrations, workflows, knowledge repositories and APIs. [09]
Interpretation and limitation: Product breadth alone does not prove better fit or faster adoption.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
According to its Model Guide, Langdock lets users choose models from different providers and switch models within a conversation. [10]
Interpretation and limitation: Model availability, limits and hosting region must be checked for the specific workspace.
Source checked: · Not hands-on tested
Evidence
Sources and research limits
38 sources used on this page. Checked means that a public source was read. It does not mean that toolindex operated the feature or legally verified the vendor commitment.
- 03nuwacom: AI Governance
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Roles, permissions, audit logs; preserve source permissions
- 05nuwacom: Pricing
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Business annual billing; Enterprise; Premium/Power; usage
- 06nuwacom: Connectors
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Apps; MCP servers; authentication; sharing connectors
- 09Langdock: Introduction to Langdock
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Chat, Agents, API, Integrations, Workflows, Library, Skills
- 10Langdock: Model Guide
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Model selection; auto routing; provider families
- 11Langdock: Knowledge bases
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Search, document retrieval and Knowledge Folder API
- 12Langdock: Privacy & Security
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: EU application/most models; no training; permissions; deployment
- 13Langdock: Pricing
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Chat & Agents; Workflows; Governance; API; adjustable selector
- 14Langdock: Enterprise
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Interoperability; REST, MCP, A2A; custom infrastructure
- 15Langdock: Completion API Overview
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Provider-compatible endpoints; supported regions; rate limits
- 16Langdock: Introduction to Agents
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents for tasks; sharing and configuration
- 17Langdock: Introduction to Workflows
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents, integrations and logic in multi-step automations
- 18OpenAI: ChatGPT Enterprise
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Enterprise models/agents; connected tools; governance; contact sales
- 19OpenAI: Business data privacy, security, and compliance
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: No training by default; AES-256 at rest; TLS 1.2+ in transit; EKM; retention; 24/7 monitoring; SOC 2/ISO certifications; enterprise access controls
- 20OpenAI: Enterprise privacy
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: SAML SSO; internal sources; retention; GPTs; API platform
- 21OpenAI: Data residency and inference residency for ChatGPT
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Eligibility; Europe EEA + Switzerland; storage vs inference scope
- 22OpenAI: Compliance and administrative tools
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Compliance API and administrative integrations
- 23Microsoft: Microsoft Copilot overview
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Basic/Premium distinction; Microsoft 365 apps; Graph; model choice
- 24Microsoft: Anthropic models in Microsoft Online Services
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Opt-in regions; EU Data Boundary exclusion; separate data-retention terms
- 25Microsoft: Enterprise data protection
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: DPA; no foundation-model training; permissions; web search and model exceptions
- 26Microsoft: License options for Microsoft Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Add-on subscription prerequisites; work vs web-based chat
- 27Europäischer Datenschutzausschuss: Data protection basics
· Regulator
Reviewed area: Lawfulness, purpose limitation, minimisation, retention, security and accountability
- 29nuwacom: nuwacom: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Core facts, summary, central terms and trust signals
- 31nuwacom: nuwacom Platform: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ, platform summary, security, API and deployment models
- 33nuwacom: nuwacom Context Engine: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on knowledge sources, permissions, updates and citations
- 35nuwacom: nuwacom Apps: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on App Builder, sandbox, sharing, export and limits
- 37nuwacom: nuwacom AI Agents: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Agents: multi-step tasks, knowledge, tool actions marked Beta, model selection and external embedding
- 39nuwacom: nuwacom Workflows: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Workflows: triggers, action nodes, logic, Agents, integrations, manual approvals, testing and scheduling
- 43nuwacom: nuwacom Chat: Facts and classification
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: FAQ on company knowledge, models, web search, guardrails and sharing
- 45nuwacom: OpenAPI-Spezifikation
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: OpenAPI: Modelle, Assets, OpenAI-kompatible Chat Completions, Agent-Endpunkte, Skills sowie Integrations- und MCP-Actions
- 46nuwacom: Sicherheitsmaßnahmen
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Verschlüsselung, Authentifizierung und Sicherheitsmaßnahmen
- 47
- 67nuwacom: Secure AI for Business
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: EU processing and storage, no training on customer data, encryption, RBAC, audit logs and deployment models
- 68nuwacom: Data Processing Agreement
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Processor terms, GDPR, customer instructions, EU processing, technical measures and controller responsibilities
- 86OpenAI: Developer mode and MCP apps in ChatGPT
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Full MCP support is beta for ChatGPT Business, Enterprise and Edu on ChatGPT web; admin enablement and publishing; Enterprise/Edu RBAC; write/modify actions and action controls
- 87Microsoft: Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility documentation
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility options include agents, connectors, plugins, Copilot APIs and developer tools
- 88Microsoft: Add MCP apps to declarative agents in Microsoft 365 Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: MCP apps run inside Microsoft 365 Copilot through declarative agents and MCP server-based actions; remote MCP server and authentication requirements
- 89Microsoft: Set up your development environment to extend Microsoft 365 Copilot
· Vendor source
Reviewed area: Licensing, tenant and admin requirements for Copilot agents; Microsoft 365 Copilot licensed users, pay-as-you-go variants, MCP Apps and organizational-data grounding